The best immersion blenders in 2022, tested by editors

 

Sure, you doubtless have already got a standard blender sitting in your countertop, and probably a meals processor tucked away in a cupboard, however for fast chores like thickening soups, making fluffy whipped cream or mixing a smoothie, an immersion blender (often known as a hand, wand or stick blender) makes a helpful addition to your kitchen arsenal.

To discover out which immersion blenders carried out the best, we put seven fashions to work, testing 4 recipes and noting every part from pace to consolation to how straightforward they had been to make use of.

Best immersion blender general

This slim, compact hand blender is full of energy, making it a flexible software that may whip up every part from smoothies to soup to spreads in seconds — and, if you’re executed, could be tucked away out of sight simply in a drawer.

Best funds immersion blender

Nutribullet’s cheap tackle the hand blender is straightforward to function, has lots of the options of its a lot pricier counterparts, and produces fab outcomes

The Vitamix Immersion Blender

Vitamix has developed a cult-like following for its highly effective — albeit dear — conventional countertop blenders over the previous a number of years. Able to eviscerate, properly, just about something, the model took prime luxurious honors in our evaluation of the best blenders. So we’re actually not shocked Vitamix’s tackle the immersion blender carried out simply as strongly.

Like its huge sister blender, the compact mannequin is comparatively costly in comparison with the competitors. At round $150, it was the third-priciest immersion blender we tested, and solely features a motor physique and mixing wand, in contrast to another fashions that included a spread of equipment. Since one of many promoting factors of an immersion blender is that you simply simply use it in the container you’re getting ready your meals in, we don’t actually thoughts the shortage of equipment right here, however they do come in helpful. Adding them does get the price of the unit up close to $200, so it’s one thing to maintain in thoughts.

For testing functions, we added the 32-ounce mixing jar ($19.95 at Vitamix) and whisk attachment ($19.95 at Vitamix) and we suggest investing in each. The whisk was of clearly superior building to the whisks equipped with the opposite fashions, and whereas the jar’s mouth was a bit slender (it was laborious to dig hummus out with a spatula) we appreciated the twin units of metric and imperial markings.

But first, the motor. The 110-volt Vitamix model boasts a 625-watt motor, probably the most highly effective of these we tested. A single-button management lets you choose from 5 variable pace settings which can be clearly displayed through LEDs on prime of the deal with. It rose above the pack for its thoughtfully designed ergonomic deal with that makes it tremendous straightforward to manage speeds with one hand, even whereas in use.

The stainless-steel mixing wand with its four-blade design (all of the others had three blades) attaches simply to the motor unit with a easy twist, locking into place, as does the whisking wand. It was solely certainly one of solely two fashions (the opposite was the Breville) to function a plastic coating on its bell, a function we love as a result of it means you gained’t have to fret about scratching up any non-stick pans or reducing your self on the blade cage.

But best of all was the Vitamix’s efficiency throughout our recipe exams. It blended our inexperienced fruit smoothie a lot sooner than every other mannequin tested, taking simply over 30 seconds and completely pulverizing all of the elements. There wasn’t a touch of fibrous leaf materials left behind and even the pesky blackberry seeds had been virtually undetectable when all was stated and executed. Our hummus got here collectively lickety-split, with the proper creamy texture and just-right consistency. While some hummus we made with different immersion blenders was just a little too skinny or just a little too thick, the Vitamix nailed it (nope, we’re by no means shopping for store-bought hummus once more). The root vegetable soup? Again, fully easy with not a hint of rosemary or thyme stalk and even the slightest chunk of vegetable. Like the entire immersion blenders we tested, the Vitamix turned out nice whipped cream; the whisk (once more, a separate buy) was of clearly superior building to the whisks equipped with the opposite fashions.

Of course, nothing’s good. With a lot energy, it’s actually necessary to look at your pace when utilizing this immersion blender, particularly for those who’re working inside a smaller container. The smoothie, for instance, was perfection on low energy and pace modes, however after we amped it up, it splashed everywhere in the counter (and our T-shirt). Lesson discovered: Staying on low energy solved that situation. And, sorry, however it’s not fully dishwasher-safe (the jar and whisk are, however not the whisk attachment itself). But, like all of the blenders tested, cleansing this stuff is about as straightforward because it will get.

The Vitamix immersion blender is an funding, particularly for those who outfit it with the complete suite of equipment. But with a three-year guarantee, critical energy, high-quality building and intelligent design, we expect it’s price each penny. And simply suppose how a lot you’ll save on hummus.

The Nutribullet Immersion Blender

We’re not going to lie: Since it’s priced at round a mere $30 — half the worth of its closest competitor — we didn’t essentially have the best of expectations for Nutribullet’s compact hand blender. But maintaining an open thoughts, we had been greater than pleasantly shocked. It did properly on all of the exams we threw at it, typically outperforming way more costly fashions.

The field features a 350-watt motor physique, stainless-steel mixing wand and whisk attachment. It measures 16 inches lengthy (when put collectively) and was comparatively light-weight at 2 kilos (the fashions we tested ranged from 2 to 4 kilos assembled). The Nutribullet’s wand twists on and locks into place with ease and we discovered the ergonomic design delivered a snug grip, and the pace controls had been among the many best to make use of of the assorted fashions we tested. Two buttons let you choose between high and low energy ranges, whereas a dial permits you to fine-tune the pace inside these ranges.

During our 4 recipe exams it did an admirable job. Our inexperienced fruit smoothie had nary a hint of kale or spinach leaf, and the Nutribullet did the job third-fastest of the entire blenders we tested. The hummus got here collectively shortly, with a easy, even texture, and our root vegetable soup was blended fully easy with little time or effort. We used the included whisk attachment, simply as straightforward to lock into place because the wand, to make whipped cream, and in addition ended up with quick and fluffy outcomes.

Both the wand and whisk indifferent fuss-free with a easy flip, and clean-up, for probably the most half, was a breeze. The motor physique, mixing wand and plastic whisk attachment base are usually not dishwasher-safe (the whisk itself is), however every part was straightforward to scrub with no need for any further elbow grease. To clear the thicker hummus from behind the blade, we merely dipped the blender in a jar of soapy water and it got here proper off.

We do want the Nutribullet got here with a mixing jar with measurement markings for comfort’s sake, however it’s definitely not a dealbreaker (and even our way more costly prime choose doesn’t include one both). A big wide-mouth Mason jar will do the trick. We did observe a little bit of vibration in use on a few of the exams, although not sufficient to make it troublesome to make use of. And the one-year restricted guarantee was shorter than these supplied on a lot of the fashions we checked out.

Because of its low worth, we might be to see how properly this mannequin stands the take a look at of time (although we have now seen principally optimistic consumer opinions on retail websites). If you’re undecided whether or not you’d use an immersion blender fairly often however are keen to seek out out, at $30, that is the proper product to take an opportunity on.

One of the immersion blender’s best options is its comfort. Small sufficient to tuck away in a kitchen drawer, it doesn’t take up counter area like a blender or meals processor, plus it’s lighter in weight and simpler to make use of than a hand mixer. They’re nice for duties like pureeing soups as a result of you may simply use the blender proper in your pot with no ready or probably messy fuss of pouring sizzling soup into a standard blender and dirtying but extra dishes, and so they allow you to whip up or mix small batches of most something you want in no matter container you’re utilizing.

The fashions we tested ranged in energy from 280 to 625 watts and all present variable pace management, which permits you higher management over the consistency of your mixing and allows you to keep away from splashing (you’ll all the time wish to begin at a low pace and work your manner up as wanted).

All the immersion blenders we tested had removable wands and attachments, making them straightforward to retailer and clear. While the entire motor models and the vast majority of the blender wands we tested are usually not dishwasher-safe, all had been easy to rinse in the sink. Stubborn caught meals may very well be simply eliminated by working the blender for a couple of seconds in a jar of soapy water. Also, one observe on security: Because the blades are uncovered, make sure your blender is unplugged earlier than eradicating the wand to keep away from any unintentional harm.

Speaking of blades, in the case of the blade guards (additionally referred to as cages), all of the fashions we tested had been stainless-steel, which is beneficial for longevity and warmth resistance, though their sizes and styles assorted barely. Some had slits or holes for added circulation, however we discovered these might lure meals like kale and in addition result in extra splashing.

A number of higher-end fashions featured plastic guards on the fringe of the blade, which we most popular. Not solely did it shield our soup pot from scratches and marks, however there have been no jagged or sharp edges to fret about that might result in unintentional nicks or cuts.

Another factor to look out for is included equipment. While some blenders merely embrace the motor and wand, others additionally function a mixing cup, whisk attachment and even chopping bowls. A mixing cup with marked measurements is definitely helpful, however not a dealbreaker, because the blender will work in any big-enough glass, ceramic, stainless-steel or plastic bowl or jar. And, typically, you’ll be utilizing your immersion blender straight in a pot or bowl. If you’re on the lookout for one thing principally to make smoothies or different blended drinks, a personal blender may be a better option anyway.

Finally, when looking for immersion blenders, one of many greatest elements to think about is the consolation of use. Where the pace controls are situated makes an enormous distinction if you’re utilizing one hand to manage the blender (your different hand will most definitely be holding the mixing jar), and we discovered fashions that make it easy to vary speeds along with your finger or thumb the simplest to make use of.

But earlier than you suppose you may change your countertop blender altogether, bear in mind immersion blenders are made for smaller jobs and softer meals that ought to nonetheless be chopped up into smaller items earlier than you start. If you wish to mix up a lot of ice or extra fibrous veggies, or must mix for longer than, say, a minute or two at a time, best stick with your conventional blender.

An immersion blender makes mixing up just enough whipped cream a breeze

Our testing pool included seven immersion blenders ranging in worth from $30 to $180; some included a spread of equipment whereas others arrived as naked instruments. In these instances we added the equipment essential to finish our exams.

While all of the fashions carried out properly in our recipe exams, which included a inexperienced fruit smoothie, hummus, a root vegetable soup and whipped cream, some fashions did a greater job mixing and ensuing in the specified texture. We discovered variations in consolation, construct, ease of use and different particulars.

To take a look at efficiency, we used 4 typical immersion blender recipes in the entire fashions.

  • Green fruit smoothie: We blended up our go-to smoothie recipe — almond milk, peanut butter, protein powder, frozen berries and a mixture of kale and spinach — noting the time every immersion blender took to finish, together with texture, whether or not any inexperienced bits had been left in the jar, any splashing that occurred and general ease.
  • Hummus: We used the identical chickpeas, tahini, olive oil, garlic, cumin and lemon juice recipe to make the unfold, paying shut consideration to texture, smoothness and ease of mixing.
  • Root vegetable soup: Using the identical easy recipe (potatoes, candy potatoes, turnips, carrots, rutabaga, onion, herbs and broth), we cooked the soup in a cast-iron pot after which recorded how properly every mannequin labored when used instantly in the pot to mix it to a creamy consistency, noting any bits that didn’t mix, the general consistency, any splashing exterior the pot and whether or not the immersion blender scratched or left marks on the underside of the pot.
  • Whipped cream: Going from low to excessive pace, we blended heavy cream with a heaping spoon of powdered sugar and a splash of vanilla with every immersion blender, noting ease of use, time and consistency. If a whisk attachment was included, we used it on this take a look at, additionally recording building and the way straightforward it was to connect and take away.

Some high-powered fashions will trigger quite a lot of suction, which may result in splashing as you attempt to pull the blender up, so we famous when suction occurred. All immersion blenders we tested had been straightforward to make use of, though some had been extra snug and easier to function than others. All fashions had been straightforward to scrub, as most components are dishwasher-safe and, excluding hummus, all blades rinsed simply underneath the kitchen faucet.

While testing, we took particular observe of the presence or absence of variable pace settings, general design and construct high quality, the standard of the included equipment (comparable to a mixing jar or whisk), ease of setup, measurement and weight, the ergonomics of the deal with and any distinctive options comparable to LED screens or cordless functionality. Some blenders included a chopping jar, which some could discover helpful, however because it wasn’t common or practically so, we didn’t take a look at this function for the needs of this comparability.

We additionally famous whether or not the blenders had been snug to make use of, whether or not vibrations made it uncomfortable to make use of, how straightforward it was to assemble and disassemble and to vary speeds whereas mixing and the way a lot time it took to finish recipes. We additionally listed all of the equipment included, user-friendliness and whether or not the components had been dishwasher-safe or straightforward to scrub.

We additionally checked out guarantee protection, customer support accessibility and worth — not simply taking note of affordability, however in specific, ensuring that any higher-priced fashions we examined had been definitely worth the further price over funds fashions.

This is a good immersion blender, with high-quality building, a chrome steel wand with a plastic protector on the bell to maintain it from scratching up pots, a pistol-grip deal with, 15 speeds that may be chosen through a dial on the prime and a wand that merely snaps into place and is launched by urgent the eject buttons. It additionally carried out nice on all our recipe exams.

But its 280-watt motor pales in comparability to the Vitamix, we wished the deal with was smaller for a extra snug grip and it’s on the heavier facet at practically 4 kilos. The Breville additionally ranked in the center of the pack for pace of use and solely has a one-year guarantee. On the opposite hand, for those who suppose you’ll use equipment or a chopper typically, for nearly $10 greater than the Vitamix, you additionally get a whisk attachment, plus an extra-large 42-ounce mixing jug, an anti-slip mat to maintain it in place and a 3-cup chopper bowl with stainless-steel blades.

Hamilton Beach Professional Hand Blender

Like the Nutribullet, this Hamilton Beach mannequin packs quite a lot of wallop for worth. With a chrome steel wand, 300-watt motor and included whisk, it did a pleasant job on our recipe exams. The smoothie left behind some flecks of kale, the hummus was a bit on the thick facet and whereas the soup ended up good and creamy, it splashed greater than different fashions. The whipped cream turned out superbly. Our greatest criticism was that we discovered it troublesome to manage the pace. It comes with 5 variables, however they’re pressure-based, so it’s a must to pay shut consideration whereas mixing at something apart from full pace (which is absolutely depressed). Like different fashions, solely the whisk is dishwasher-safe, however a five-year restricted guarantee is a bonus.

All-Clad Cordless Rechargeable Hand Blender

No doubt, a cordless immersion blender could be actually handy. Whether you’d moderately not stretch a wire throughout the counter to puree your vegetable soup or you might have a kitchen with oddly positioned shops, it could actually definitely simplify your work. Of course, it’s a must to hold the factor charged, or it’s just about ineffective. All-Clad’s 600-watt stainless-steel model helps hold the guesswork out of its battery life with a light-weight that flashes purple whereas charging, flashes blue when fading and stays stable blue whereas charged and in use. Once we acquired it charged up, the blender, which comes with the motor, mixing wand and charging base, was straightforward sufficient to twist into place and begin utilizing. But we discovered the dear All-Clad was outperformed by a lot of the different fashions. The wand induced quite a lot of suction whereas mixing our smoothie and kale acquired caught in cutouts of the blade cage. The hummus and whipped cream turned out properly, however we discovered the laborious manner why it’s not beneficial to be used on nonstick or forged iron pots, because it left marks on the underside of our Le Creuset whereas mixing the soup. If you’re keen to spend $180 on an immersion blender (with a two-year guarantee), we are saying keep on with a wire and go for the Vitamix or Breville.

There was so much we appreciated about Braun’s immersion blender. It did a high quality job on all our recipes, leaving our smoothie, hummus, soup and whipped cream properly blended. We admired its stainless-steel design and appreciated its 500-watt motor and the way simply its attachments snapped into place. In addition to the motor and wand, it comes with a 20-ounce beaker, whisk and 2-cup chopper attachment (apart from the motor base, gearboxes and chopper lid, all different components are dishwasher-safe).

But at 3.5 kilos, it’s on the heavier facet; our bicep acquired a pleasant little exercise and our hand was barely sore after mixing up our soup. And the blade cage was a bit scary — sharp-looking and considerably tough across the edges, the place most fashions had been easy, or just like the Vitamix and Breville, protected by a plastic protecting. This mannequin makes use of a pressure-controlled set off to regulate pace and we discovered it troublesome to take care of the pace we needed. It additionally has a versatile wand designed to permit you to push the wand gently into your meals for extra coarse or chopped outcomes, one thing we sit up for experimenting with in different recipes.

KitchenAid Cordless Hand Blender

Let’s begin with the professionals: The cordless function of KitchenAid’s stainless-steel hand blender makes it very easy to make use of as soon as it’s all charged up and able to go. This mannequin additionally labored nice on all our recipes. The smoothie time was second quickest, our hummus was additionally quick and good and creamy, our soup ended up tremendous easy and our whipped cream got here to good delicate peaks in no time. We appreciated that the battery indicator modifications colour from inexperienced to purple to let when it’s time to plug it in and that the field features a mixing jar and pan guard together with the motor and wand items (plus, the arm, jar and pan guard are all dishwasher-safe). It additionally comes in a slew of colours and has just a little built-in stand on the physique so it rests properly in your counter and gained’t roll round. But listed below are the cons: Though it weighs simply 2.5 kilos, it feels moderately heavy in hand and it has a security button function that should be held down on the similar time you press the facility set off, which could be awkward. We discovered it troublesome to manage the pace (which is modified in line with how a lot strain you employ), although it was the toughest mannequin to detach the wand from, and we skilled a lot of vibration, each in the hand holding the blender and the one holding the jar. But, once more, when it got here to efficiency on recipes, the KitchenAid was in our prime three, so for those who’re keen to experiment with the pace management, for $100, it might be price a glance.

Source link